The regional edition of the SAPOA Office Vacancy Survey for the third quarter of 2026 is out. It carries the survey’s national findings, which we covered in our SAPOA Q3 2026 Office Vacancy Report, together with the detailed node-by-node table for the City of Cape Town.
Nationally, office vacancy improved to 11.8% in September 2026, the lowest level in more than six years. Cape Town remains the tightest metro in the country at 6.9%, with 192,862 m² of its 2.79 million m² of surveyed office space available to let. This quarter’s case study is the Cape Town CBD itself, broken down precinct by precinct.
Below we reproduce the whole report section by section with all of its charts, from its definitions to the full Cape Town table of vacancy and asking rentals by grade for all seven of the city’s office nodes, followed by its notice and disclaimer.
Definitions
The report grades office buildings and uses two terms in a specific way. These are its definitions.
| Office Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| Prime Grade | Top quality, modern space. Prime buildings are often considered iconic and a flagship in their market. Essential features include high security, both manned and electronic, the latest generation of building services, ample parking and a prestigious lobby finish. High ceiling heights, flexible floorplates and column spacing. To be considered Prime-grade, an office should be 4-star Green Certified or, in the absence of a formal rating, include equivalent environmental initiatives, which could include zoned lighting, energy-efficient building services and systems, water-efficient fixtures, rainwater harvesting, water-wise landscaping and low-VOC interior finishes. |
| A-Grade | High-quality properties providing good access, professionally managed with continued above-average maintenance. High-quality modern finishes, air conditioning and adequate on-site parking. A clearly articulated entrance and a lobby with clear circulation. High ceiling heights and flexible floorplates likely. |
| B-Grade | Generally older buildings, but accommodation and finishes are close to modern standards because of refurbishment and renovation from time to time. Air conditioning and on-site parking, or bays dedicated to the building, are essential. Minimum ceiling height and less flexible floorplates. Modest landscaping with minimal exterior space. |
| C-Grade | Buildings typically in fair condition but with older-style finishes, services and building systems. Purely functional space with generally limited infrastructure. May or may not be air-conditioned or have on-site parking. Minimal or no lobby, landscaping or exterior space. Unarticulated entrance. |
| Term | Description |
|---|---|
| Gross asking rental | Gross asking rental as published by the landlord. Gross rental is defined as basic rental plus the fixed contractual recoveries payable by the tenant, and excludes metered utility charges like water and electricity. The asking rental could be subject to negotiation and would differ from the rental achieved. |
| Developments | Properties are considered to be in development only when ground has been broken on site. Tenant-driven developments are not included. In the case of phased developments, only the lettable area currently under construction is considered. |
Key Findings
- • Office recovery continues to gain traction. South Africa’s office vacancy rate declined to 11.8% in Q3 2026, five percentage points below its mid-2022 peak, supported by positive net absorption and a further reduction in available space.
- • Recovery broadens beyond higher-quality offices. Vacancies declined across A-, B- and C-grade offices, with C-grade recording the largest quarterly improvement. Prime vacancies remain exceptionally low at 4.7%, while asking rentals are rising across all grades.
- • Regional recovery progressing at different speeds. Cape Town remains the tightest major metro at 6.9%, while Durban and Tshwane now also record vacancies below 10%. Johannesburg has improved materially since 2022, while Gqeberha continues to lag the broader recovery.
- • Decentralised markets maintain their advantage. Decentralised vacancies remain substantially below the CBDs at 11.0% versus 16.1%, although performance varies considerably by metro. Cape Town’s and Durban’s decentralised markets stand out with particularly low availability.
- • Limited new supply supports market rebalancing. Development activity has fallen to just 0.5% of completed stock, with approximately 100,500 m² under construction. A 70.4% pre-let rate indicates that the limited pipeline remains predominantly tenant-led.
- • Distress is increasingly concentrated in specific assets and nodes. Broader market improvement masks persistent pockets of distress, particularly among secondary-quality buildings. Highly vacant properties remain geographically concentrated, with Johannesburg CBD recording the greatest incidence of distressed offices.
- • Surplus space has fallen substantially since the peak. Around 920,000 m² of available office space has been removed from the market since June 2022, although the remaining 2.25 million m² means the absorption challenge remains larger than at comparable vacancy rates in earlier cycles.
- • Micro-location increasingly differentiates performance. Large vacancy differences within individual office nodes show that headline market averages can conceal materially different conditions. Building quality, age, specification and micro-location are becoming increasingly important determinants of occupancy and leasing performance.
Headline Results
South Africa’s office vacancy rate improved to 11.8% in the third quarter of 2026, its lowest level in more than six years. The improvement extends the sector’s recovery from the mid-2022 peak, when vacancy reached 16.8%, and marks a further step towards more normalised market conditions. Of the 54 nodes surveyed, vacancy improved in 23, deteriorated in 21 and was unchanged in the remaining 10.
The survey covered 2,691 completed office properties and active developments across 54 nodes, together almost 19.5 million m² of gross lettable area including developments under construction.
The Market at Key Points in the Cycle
| Low pre-GFC Jun 2008 |
Peak Dec 2013 |
Low pre-COVID Dec 2019 |
Peak Jun 2022 |
Latest Sep 2026 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completed GLA (m²) | 13,130,426 | 16,145,742 | 18,837,046 | 18,925,677 | 18,985,589 |
| Completed area available (m²) | 645,057 | 1,794,626 | 2,073,310 | 3,164,979 | 2,244,535 |
| Net space absorbed (m²) | 1,745 | −38,387 | −4,183 | −16,374 | 69,502 |
| Vacancy rate | 4.9% | 11.1% | 11.0% | 16.7% | 11.8% |
| Total vacancy rate | 7.6% | 13.2% | 11.4% | 16.8% | 11.9% |
| Development GLA (m²) | 667,045 | 796,016 | 247,523 | 125,586 | 100,503 |
| Development pre-let rate | 38.8% | 44.3% | 59.8% | 71.4% | 70.4% |
Office market fundamentals continued to strengthen during the quarter. The improvement was supported by positive net absorption of almost 70,000 m², while the amount of completed space available declined further. Asking rental growth remained relatively firm at 7.2% year-on-year, despite easing from recent highs. At the same time, the development pipeline remains constrained and increasingly tenant-led, with 70.4% of space under development already pre-let. Together, improving occupancy, positive absorption and limited speculative development point to a progressively tighter office market, although conditions continue to vary considerably across individual nodes and grades.
Office Vacancy by Grade
Office market fundamentals continued to strengthen in Q3 2026, with the improvement increasingly extending beyond higher-quality stock. A-grade vacancy declined to 9.5% and B-grade eased to 15.9%. The strongest quarterly improvement was in C-grade offices, where vacancy fell by 80 basis points to 15.6%, moving marginally below B-grade. Prime vacancy edged up to 4.7% but remains exceptionally low relative to the other grades and its historical range.
National Office Vacancy by Grade
| Grade | Rentable (m²) | Available (m²) | Sep 2026 | Jun 2026 | Mar 2026 | Dec 2025 | Avg Asking Rental (R/m²) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prime | 2,348,075 | 109,819 | 4.7% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 6.0% | R234 |
| A-Grade | 7,811,075 | 740,209 | 9.5% | 9.7% | 10.2% | 10.5% | R149 |
| B-Grade | 6,996,068 | 1,109,295 | 15.9% | 16.3% | 16.8% | 16.5% | R123 |
| C-Grade | 1,830,371 | 285,212 | 15.6% | 16.4% | 16.7% | 16.4% | R101 |
| All grades | 18,985,589 | 2,244,535 | 11.8% | 12.2% | 12.6% | 12.8% | - |
Rental trends provide further evidence of improving market conditions. Prime asking rentals reached R234/m² per month in Q3 2026, extending a strong period of rental growth and widening the premium to the other grades. A-grade rentals averaged R149/m², while B- and C-grade rentals increased to R123/m² and R101/m². The upward trajectory across all four grades is notable, with improving occupancy increasingly supporting rental levels beyond the Prime segment.
The recovery is also becoming more broadly based. Prime stock continues to benefit from constrained availability, with vacancy below 5% supporting greater pricing power, while improving B- and particularly C-grade vacancy suggests firmer conditions across secondary-quality stock. Some of this improvement may reflect the conversion of older or less competitive offices to residential and other uses, removing surplus space alongside improved tenant demand. While this is helping to rebalance supply, the persistent vacancy gap between Prime and secondary stock highlights the continued importance of quality, location and building competitiveness.
In Cape Town the grades are tighter: adding up the node table at the end of this article gives Prime vacancy of 2.2%, A-grade 4.2%, B-grade 12.6% and C-grade 16.4%.
Office Vacancy by Region
The latest regional data show a marked divergence in office market conditions across South Africa’s major metros. Cape Town remains the tightest market at 6.9%, followed by Tshwane at 8.9% and Durban at 9.3%. At the other end of the spectrum, Gqeberha and Johannesburg continue to record considerably higher vacancy of 15.7% and 14.7%. This spread of almost nine percentage points between the tightest and weakest markets highlights the increasingly localised nature of office demand and supply.
Office Vacancy by Metro
| Metro | Rentable (m²) | Available (m²) | Sep 2026 | Jun 2026 | Mar 2026 | Dec 2025 | Since Q1 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Cape Town | 2,789,334 | 192,862 | 6.9% | 6.5% | 6.1% | 6.1% | −6.1% |
| City of Tshwane | 4,159,199 | 371,843 | 8.9% | 8.5% | 10.1% | 9.9% | −3.2% |
| eThekwini (Durban) | 1,626,280 | 151,297 | 9.3% | 11.9% | 11.7% | 12.1% | −6.8% |
| City of Johannesburg | 10,272,035 | 1,506,789 | 14.7% | 15.1% | 15.5% | 15.8% | −4.8% |
| Nelson Mandela Bay (Gqeberha) | 138,741 | 21,744 | 15.7% | 15.6% | 15.3% | 15.2% | −1.2% |
| All surveyed nodes | 18,985,589 | 2,244,535 | 11.8% | 12.2% | 12.6% | 12.8% | - |
SAPOA has revised its earlier quarters since the Q2 report, so some of the June, March and December figures here differ slightly from those in our Q2 article.
The scale of the recovery since early 2022 has also differed substantially between metros. Durban has recorded the largest improvement, with vacancy down 6.8 percentage points since Q1 2022, marginally ahead of Cape Town’s 6.1-point reduction. Johannesburg has also made significant progress, with vacancy falling 4.8 points despite remaining comparatively elevated. Tshwane has improved by 3.2 points, while Gqeberha’s vacancy has declined by only 1.2 points.
Importantly, lower vacancy is no longer confined to Cape Town, with both Durban and Tshwane now below 10%. Johannesburg’s sizeable improvement from its 2022 levels indicates that excess space is gradually being absorbed in the country’s largest office market, although availability remains substantial. Gqeberha stands apart, with limited improvement and vacancy still above 15%. Overall, the office recovery is broadening geographically, but at distinctly different speeds, reflecting differences in occupier demand, local economic conditions, development activity and the amount and competitiveness of existing office stock.
Office Vacancy by Location Type
The distinction between CBD and decentralised office markets remains pronounced, with decentralised vacancy at 11.0% compared with 16.1% across the CBDs nationally. The five-point gap continues to reflect stronger occupancy outside the traditional city centres, although performance varies considerably by metro, and the aggregate figures mask some notable exceptions, particularly Tshwane, where the relationship between CBD and decentralised vacancy is effectively reversed.
Tshwane’s CBD remains an outlier, with vacancy of just 3.5% compared with 9.9% across its decentralised nodes, which likely reflects the capital’s distinctive occupier base, where government-related demand underpins CBD occupancy. Cape Town presents a different pattern: decentralised vacancy remains exceptionally low at 2.7%, while its CBD vacancy has risen to 12.5%. The widening gap suggests demand continues to favour Cape Town’s decentralised office nodes despite generally tight conditions across the broader metro.
Johannesburg continues to face the greatest CBD challenge, with vacancy of 23.4% compared with 13.5% in decentralised locations. Durban shows an even wider relative divergence, with CBD vacancy of 19.7% against only 5.3% across its decentralised nodes. Among decentralised markets, Cape Town and Durban therefore stand out with particularly low availability, while Johannesburg remains the most challenged of the four major metros. Overall, location within a metro remains a significant determinant of office performance, with decentralised nodes generally benefiting from stronger demand and lower vacancy than the traditional CBDs.
The CBD and decentralised figures in this section, like the left-hand chart, run to June 2026. By September, the node tables put CBD Cape Town at 14.0%, CBD Johannesburg at 21.6% and CBD Durban at 15.7%, with Pretoria’s CBD unchanged at 3.5%, and the right-hand chart shows decentralised vacancy of 2.7% in Cape Town, 4.4% in Durban, 10.4% in Tshwane, 13.3% in Johannesburg and 15.7% in Gqeberha.
Development Activity
Office development activity remains exceptionally subdued, with projects under construction equivalent to just 0.5% of completed office stock. Development declined to approximately 100,500 m² (100,503 m²) in Q3 2026, near the lowest levels recorded in the survey’s history and well below previous development cycles. Despite improving vacancy and rental growth, the limited pipeline suggests developers remain cautious about adding new supply, with the market continuing to prioritise absorbing and repositioning existing stock. Of the space under construction, 29,750 m² is still available to let.
The limited development that is proceeding remains predominantly tenant-led. Around 70.4% of space under development is pre-let, comfortably above the long-term average of 55.3%. Although below the particularly high pre-let rates of recent years, the current level indicates that substantial tenant commitment remains an important prerequisite for new projects. The combination of low development volumes and relatively high pre-leasing reduces the risk of speculative supply adding materially to future vacancy.
The constrained pipeline is becoming an increasingly important part of the recovery story. With development having fallen sharply from the elevated levels of the previous cycle, relatively little new uncommitted space is entering the market just as vacancy is declining and rental growth is strengthening. This should support further rebalancing of supply and demand, while creating opportunities for selective new development where occupier requirements, location and achievable rentals can justify construction.
Cape Town accounts for 34,000 m² of the national pipeline, about a third: 15,000 m² in the Central node (Pinelands and Black River Park), 10,500 m² in the CBD and 8,500 m² in Century City. The detail is in the Cape Town table below.
Distressed Mid-Quality Offices the Largest Drag on Vacancy
The distribution of rentable office space across vacancy brackets highlights the uneven nature of the recovery. While around half of A-, B- and C-grade stock is fully let, performance differs materially across the remaining space. A-grade offices have a greater proportion of space in the lower vacancy brackets, while B- and C-grade buildings account for more stock at elevated vacancy levels. This suggests distress remains concentrated in lower-grade assets despite improving market fundamentals.
Distressed assets continue to face significant barriers to recovery. Physical limitations can reduce their appeal to modern occupiers, while valuations, refurbishment costs and redevelopment feasibility may constrain intervention. Weaker properties may therefore continue to put downward pressure on rentals in the affected nodes, with landlords relying on competitive rents, incentives or alternative uses to improve occupancy.
Highly vacant buildings are also concentrated in specific nodes. Johannesburg CBD has the largest proportion of distressed properties, with more than a third of its buildings above 30% vacancy, followed by Milpark and Walmer/Fairview, and several other Johannesburg nodes also feature prominently. While broader occupancy fundamentals are improving, persistent pockets of highly vacant buildings suggest an increasingly polarised market in which asset quality, location and building competitiveness are becoming more important determinants of performance.
Micro-Market Dynamics Within the Cape Town CBD
The Cape Town CBD displays meaningful differences in office performance across its precincts, with vacancy ranging from 7.6% to almost 20%. The variation is notable given the CBD’s relatively compact geography, and it reflects differences in the composition of office stock: some precincts have a greater concentration of older buildings, while others have benefited from newer developments and refurbished stock. Together with accessibility and amenities, these differences can materially influence occupier demand.
Cape Town CBD Offices by Precinct, All Grades
| Precinct | Vacancy | Rentable (m²) | Vacant (m²) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between Wale and Strand | 19.9% | 178,934 | 35,600 |
| Between Wale and Hans Strijdom | 16.9% | 346,761 | 58,700 |
| Hans Strijdom, east to the N1 and Christiaan Barnard | 11.0% | 360,498 | 39,700 |
| West of Wale and periphery | 7.6% | 160,221 | 12,100 |
| CBD Cape Town | 14.0% | 1,046,414 | 146,102 |
The area between Wale and Strand Streets records the highest vacancy at 19.9%, around 35,600 m² of available space. The larger precinct between Wale and Hans Strijdom has a lower vacancy rate of 16.9% but, given its greater stock base, accounts for the largest volume of vacant space at approximately 58,700 m². By comparison, the area east of Hans Strijdom records 11.0%, while the western and peripheral parts of the CBD perform considerably better at 7.6%.
These differences show why a headline CBD vacancy rate can obscure important variation at a more granular level. Building age, quality and specification can materially influence performance alongside location, particularly as occupiers favour modern and efficient space. Granular spatial analysis can therefore give owners and investors additional context when assessing leasing prospects, competitive positioning and potential repositioning opportunities.
Vacancy Rates Down, but Surplus Space Remains a Challenge
The long-term relationship between vacancy rates and available space shows how much the scale of South Africa’s office market has changed over successive cycles. While the vacancy rate is a useful measure of market balance, the absolute volume of vacant space gives important context: at similar vacancy rates, today’s larger office market can contain substantially more available space than during earlier periods of market weakness.
By September 2026, vacancy had declined to 11.8%, with approximately 2.25 million m² of completed office space available. That is a substantial improvement from June 2022, when vacancy reached 16.8% and available space exceeded 3.1 million m². Around 920,000 m² of available space has therefore been removed from the market, reflecting both absorption and changes to the underlying stock. Nevertheless, available space remains above the levels associated with comparable vacancy rates in earlier cycles.
The recovery therefore needs to be viewed in terms of both the vacancy rate and the quantum of space being worked through. Encouragingly, considerable progress has been made since 2022, and the limited development pipeline reduces the risk of significant new supply. Further absorption, together with conversions and the repositioning of less competitive buildings, should support continued rebalancing. For owners, the uneven distribution of the remaining vacancy reinforces the importance of asset quality, location and active asset management.
City of Cape Town: Office Node Definitions
The survey divides Cape Town into seven office nodes. The figures in the table below describe the buildings inside these boundaries.
- • Bellville: Jip de Jager / Mike Pienaar to the west, Voortrekker Road to the south, Old Oak to the east and Van Riebeeck Road to the north.
- • CBD Cape Town: Chiappini Street to the west, the Gardens suburb to the south, Tennant Street to the east and the harbour freeway to the north.
- • Century City: properties within the Century City mixed-use node, including offices on either side of Ratanga Road up to Century Boulevard.
- • Claremont: Highwick / Pine to the south, Protea / Campground Road to the north, Palmyra to the east and the M3 to the west.
- • Central: the Pinelands office node and the Black River Park precinct, bounded by Settlers Way to the south, Jan Smuts to the north and east, and Liesbeek Parkway to the west.
- • Rondebosch / Newlands: Protea / Campground Road to the south, Woolsack Road to the north, Campground Road to the east and the M3 to the west.
- • V&A Waterfront: properties within the V&A Waterfront precinct.
City of Cape Town: Vacancy and Asking Rentals by Node
The regional report’s node table gives every Cape Town node’s rentable area, available space and vacancy by grade (P = Prime), how vacancy has moved over the past three quarters, and the lowest, highest and median gross asking rental. Areas are in m² and rentals in rand per m² per month.
| Grade | Rentable | Available | Sep 2026 | Jun 2026 | Mar 2026 | Dec 2025 | Min | Max | Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellville | |||||||||
| P | 52,652 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - |
| A | 343,751 | 2,809 | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 175 | 240 | 198 |
| B | 144,356 | 12,400 | 8.6% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 9.6% | 100 | 185 | 144 |
| C | 8,218 | 1,675 | 20.4% | 22.3% | 23.1% | 23.1% | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Total | 548,977 | 16,884 | 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 4.4% | 80 | 240 | 168 |
| Claremont | |||||||||
| P | 14,327 | 502 | 3.5% | 3.5% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 355 | 360 | 358 |
| A | 71,587 | 2,823 | 3.9% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 2.7% | 180 | 330 | 240 |
| B | 50,028 | 3,740 | 7.5% | 5.9% | 8.3% | 15.7% | 180 | 240 | 206 |
| C | 10,968 | 668 | 6.1% | 9.6% | 7.1% | 9.1% | 110 | 240 | 167 |
| Total | 146,910 | 7,733 | 5.3% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 7.4% | 110 | 360 | 231 |
| CBD Cape Town | |||||||||
| P | 71,356 | 3,619 | 5.1% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 2.9% | 284 | 310 | 299 |
| A | 361,428 | 38,704 | 10.7% | 7.4% | 5.8% | 2.2% | 170 | 250 | 212 |
| B | 511,224 | 86,223 | 16.9% | 16.3% | 15.8% | 15.3% | 85 | 289 | 158 |
| C | 102,406 | 17,556 | 17.1% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 14.6% | 90 | 180 | 126 |
| Total | 1,046,414 | 146,102 | 14.0% | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.9% | 85 | 310 | 165 |
| Rondebosch / Newlands | |||||||||
| A | 90,254 | 726 | 0.8% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 4.0% | 135 | 280 | 233 |
| B | 21,352 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 180 | 190 | 185 |
| Total | 111,606 | 726 | 0.7% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 3.6% | 135 | 280 | 219 |
| Century City | |||||||||
| P | 114,019 | 3,942 | 3.5% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 230 | 300 | 272 |
| A | 227,469 | 3,578 | 1.6% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 185 | 240 | 207 |
| B | 49,651 | 367 | 0.7% | 0.7% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 100 | 185 | 148 |
| Total | 391,139 | 7,887 | 2.0% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 2.7% | 100 | 300 | 202 |
| Central (Pinelands & Black River Park) | |||||||||
| P | 90,000 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% | - | - | - |
| A | 272,975 | 11,690 | 4.3% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 195 | 240 | 215 |
| B | 36,741 | 741 | 2.0% | 0.5% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 140 | 160 | 153 |
| Total | 399,716 | 12,431 | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 140 | 240 | 189 |
| V&A Waterfront | |||||||||
| P | 66,000 | 1,099 | 1.7% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 420 | 420 | 420 |
| A | 72,675 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.8% | 1.7% | - | - | - |
| B | 5,897 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - |
| Total | 144,572 | 1,099 | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 420 | 420 | 420 |
| City of Cape Town (all seven nodes) | |||||||||
| Total | 2,789,334 | 192,862 | 6.9% | 6.5% | 6.1% | 6.1% | - | - | - |
Gross asking rentals are the basic rental plus fixed contractual recoveries, excluding metered utilities, and may differ from the rental achieved after negotiation. A dash means the report gives no asking rental for that row, either because there was no vacant space or because no asking rental was disclosed.
Committed New Developments in Cape Town
| Node | Rentable Area (m²) | Available (m²) | Gross Asking Rental (R/m²) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central (Pinelands & Black River Park) | 15,000 | 1,600 | R340 |
| CBD Cape Town | 10,500 | 9,177 | R295 |
| Century City | 8,500 | - | R285 |
| All surveyed nodes (national) | 100,503 | 29,750 | - |
What stands out. The CBD holds 1.05 million m², 37.5% of Cape Town’s office space, but 146,102 m² of the city’s 192,862 m² available, about 76%. Its B-grade buildings alone account for 86,223 m². The six decentralised nodes together are at 2.7%.
The CBD’s rise from 9.9% to 14.0% over the past three quarters came mostly from A-grade, which went from 2.2% to 10.7%, while B-grade rose from 15.3% to 16.9% and C-grade from 14.6% to 17.1%. Claremont went the other way, from 7.4% to 5.3%, as its B-grade vacancy fell from 15.7% to 7.5%, and Rondebosch / Newlands is now the tightest node in the city at 0.7%.
The V&A Waterfront is effectively full at 0.8%, and its Prime space asks the highest rental in the city at R420/m². Of the 10,500 m² under construction in the CBD, 9,177 m² is still available, while Central’s 15,000 m² has 1,600 m² left. Central’s Prime stock has grown to 90,000 m², all of it let.
Key Takeaways
- • National office vacancy improved to 11.8% in Q3 2026, the lowest level in more than six years, with A-, B- and C-grade vacancy all down and C-grade improving most.
- • Cape Town is the tightest metro at 6.9%, its decentralised nodes are the tightest in the country at 2.7%, and Durban and Tshwane have joined it below 10%.
- • The CBD holds about 76% of Cape Town’s vacant office space, and CBD A-grade vacancy has risen from 2.2% to 10.7% over three quarters.
- • Within the CBD, vacancy ranges from 7.6% west of Wale Street to 19.9% between Wale and Strand.
- • Development is at just 0.5% of stock nationally, with a 70.4% pre-let rate, and 34,000 m² of the 100,503 m² pipeline is in Cape Town.
- • About 2.25 million m² of office space is still available nationally, 920,000 m² less than at the June 2022 peak, with distress concentrated in B- and C-grade buildings.
Need Cape Town Office Market Intelligence?
Whether you are relocating, expanding, re-leasing a building or weighing up an acquisition, Baker Street Properties can take you from node averages to the specific buildings, rentals and availability that matter for your decision.
Source: SAPOA / MSCI / Gmaven Office Vacancy Survey, Q3 2026 (Regional edition).
Get in TouchBaker Street Properties - First in Property
Tel: +27 (0)21 461 1660 | Email: manager@baker-street.co.za | Website: www.baker-street.co.za
1st Floor, Block B, The Boulevard Office Park, Searle Street, Cape Town, 7925
Registration number: 1996/002055/07 | VAT number: 4310152527
Notice and disclaimer
This document and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries (collectively, “MSCI”), or MSCI’s licensors, direct or indirect suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the “Information Providers”) and is provided for informational purposes only. The Information may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced or redisseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from MSCI.
The Information may not be used to create derivative works or to verify or correct other data or information. For example (but without limitation), the Information may not be used to create indexes, databases, risk models, analytics, software, or in connection with the issuing, offering, sponsoring, managing or marketing of any securities, portfolios, financial products or other investment vehicles utilizing or based on, linked to, tracking or otherwise derived from the Information or any other MSCI data, information, products or services.
The user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. NONE OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDERS MAKES ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION (OR THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE USE THEREOF), AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EACH INFORMATION PROVIDER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ORIGINALITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE) WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE INFORMATION.
Without limiting any of the foregoing and to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event shall any Information Provider have any liability regarding any of the Information for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential (including lost profits) or any other damages even if notified of the possibility of such damages. The foregoing shall not exclude or limit any liability that may not by applicable law be excluded or limited, including without limitation (as applicable), any liability for death or personal injury to the extent that such injury results from the negligence or willful default of itself, its servants, agents or sub-contractors.
Information containing any historical information, data or analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The Information should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. All Information is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons.
None of the Information constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), any security, financial product or other investment vehicle or any trading strategy.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class or trading strategy or other category represented by an index is only available through third party investable instruments (if any) based on that index. MSCI does not issue, sponsor, endorse, market, offer, review or otherwise express any opinion regarding any fund, ETF, derivative or other security, investment, financial product or trading strategy that is based on, linked to or seeks to provide an investment return related to the performance of any MSCI index (collectively, “Index Linked Investments”). MSCI makes no assurance that any Index Linked Investments will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. MSCI Inc. is not an investment adviser or fiduciary and MSCI makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any Index Linked Investments.
Index returns do not represent the results of actual trading of investible assets/securities. MSCI maintains and calculates indexes, but does not manage actual assets. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor may pay to purchase the securities underlying the index or Index Linked Investments. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause the performance of an Index Linked Investment to be different than the MSCI index performance.
The Information may contain back tested data. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. There are frequently material differences between back tested performance results and actual results subsequently achieved by any investment strategy.
Constituents of MSCI equity indexes are listed companies, which are included in or excluded from the indexes according to the application of the relevant index methodologies. Accordingly, constituents in MSCI equity indexes may include MSCI Inc., clients of MSCI or suppliers to MSCI. Inclusion of a security within an MSCI index is not a recommendation by MSCI to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice.
Data and information produced by various affiliates of MSCI Inc., including MSCI ESG Research LLC and Barra LLC, may be used in calculating certain MSCI indexes. More information can be found in the relevant index methodologies on www.msci.com.
MSCI receives compensation in connection with licensing its indexes to third parties. MSCI Inc.’s revenue includes fees based on assets in Index Linked Investments. Information can be found in MSCI Inc.’s company filings on the Investor Relations section of www.msci.com.
MSCI ESG Research LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and a subsidiary of MSCI Inc. Except with respect to any applicable products or services from MSCI ESG Research, neither MSCI nor any of its products or services recommends, endorses, approves or otherwise expresses any opinion regarding any issuer, securities, financial products or instruments or trading strategies and MSCI’s products or services are not intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Issuers mentioned or included in any MSCI ESG Research materials may include MSCI Inc., clients of MSCI or suppliers to MSCI, and may also purchase research or other products or services from MSCI ESG Research. MSCI ESG Research materials, including materials utilized in any MSCI ESG Indexes or other products, have not been submitted to, nor received approval from, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory body.
Any use of or access to products, services or information of MSCI requires a license from MSCI. MSCI, Barra, RiskMetrics, IPD and other MSCI brands and product names are the trademarks, service marks, or registered trademarks of MSCI or its subsidiaries in the United States and other jurisdictions. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. “Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)” is a service mark of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s.